Jump to content

Welcome to The Forum

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, and more. For easy entry, just sign in with your Twitter account.

Your Arrival

You've safely landed within Heartbreakers Community, home to the future of fandoms. If you're a fan with an open mind and an open heart, then you've reached your perfect destination.

Questions or Concerns

Need a guide through the new Heartbreakers Community? Don't hesitate to contact a member of staff for help. They'll be happy to assist you during your stay.

The Future of Fandoms

If you're an often silenced member of any particular fandom, you can find haven and community here. We welcome everyone. Connect your Twitter account for easy, instant access.

    An Evolution

    What began as a women's wrestling community, has exploded into something bigger. No longer will our voices be silenced in fandoms we love.

      For More Heartbreakers

      Join our Discord to chat with other members of the community, in real time.

      Michael B. Jordan as Superman? DC Plots Future With Superman, Green Lantern and R-Rated Movies


      Recommended Posts

      Quote

      DC Films appears to have hit its stride, rebounding from the commercial failure of “Justice League” and the critical drubbing of “Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice” with a few well-timed box office successes. “Aquaman” and “Joker” both generated over $1 billion at the global box office, becoming the first DC productions to reach those lofty figures since Christopher Nolan wrapped up his Batman trilogy with 2012’s “The Dark Knight Rises.” The studio also scored with last spring’s “Shazam!,” a cheeky spin on the spandex genre, and has high hopes for upcoming releases such as “Wonder Woman 1984” and “Birds of Prey.”

      “They’re on the upswing,” said Shawn Robbins, chief analyst at BoxOffice.com. “They had a rocky period, but they’re starting to find their footing.”

      DC Films may have achieved more consistency when it comes to reviews and box office performance, but there are still hurdles to overcome. Namely, the company and its parent studio, Warner Bros., have yet to figure out what to do with iconic characters Superman and Batman. The studio is farther along when it comes to Bruce Wayne’s alter ego, having re-cast the role most recently played by Ben Affleck with the younger and edgier Robert Pattinson. The former “Twilight” heartthrob has moved beyond his tween idol days, appearing in indies for the Safdie brothers, David Cronenberg, and Robert Eggers. He will don the cape and cowl in “The Batman,” which will be directed by Matt Reeves (“Dawn of the Planet of the Apes”) and will feature villains such as the Riddler (Paul Dano), Penguin (Colin Farrell), and Catwoman (Zoe Kravitz).

      There had been chatter that the entire Batman film would unfold in Arkham Asylum, the high-security prison known to comic book fans for housing super-criminals, but that is not the case, according to insiders. Only a handful of scenes will be set at Arkham. If the movie works, Warner Bros. and DC believe that any of these villains could headline their own spinoff movies. Key cast members in both “The Batman” and “Birds of Prey” have contract options to appear in sequels and standalone films.

      The studio has less clarity on what to do with Superman, a character who has now been rebooted two different times in the last 13 years, once with Brandon Routh (“Superman Returns”) and later with Henry Cavill (“Man of Steel”) without landing on a winning strategy. Superman has also appeared frequently on television, in shows such as “Lois and Clark” and “Smallville,” which has led to some fears at Warners that the market could be over-saturated with hot takes on all things Clark Kent.

      To help find a way to make Superman relevant to modern audiences, studio brass has been polling lots of high-profile talent. There have been discussions with J.J. Abrams, whose company Bad Robot recently signed a massive first-look deal with the studio, and there was a meeting with Michael B. Jordan earlier this year with the “Creed” star pitching Warners on a vision for the character. However, Jordan isn’t ready to commit to taking on the project since filming doesn’t seem likely to happen for several years and he has a full dance card of projects. Insiders think that a new Superman film is unlikely to hit screens before 2023, given that there’s no script and no director attached.

      Internally, insiders are quick to credit Walter Hamada, the longtime New Line executive who was brought on board in 2018 as president of DC Films, with helping to plot a new, more sustainable course for the DC cinematic universe. He’s credited with having a strong sense of story and with keeping a firm eye on the bottom line, reining in budgets so productions don’t go off the rails. It also helps that he is closely allied with Warner Bros. film chief Toby Emmerich, with both men having worked together on past New Line hits such as “It” and “The Conjuring.” Insiders believe that under the former regime of top DC film executives Jon Berg and Geoff Johns and DC Entertainment head Diane Nelson, there were too many decision makers involved, leading to the lack of a clear vision. They also maintain that Warner Bros. erred by initially rushing movies in the hopes of making release dates that had been snapped up before scripts were even fully in place. Emmerich has made righting the DC ship a key priority since taking control of the studio in 2017.

      “Their initial mistake was that they tried to do too much, too fast,” said Robbins. “They were trying to copy the Marvel model, but that took time and years of building up characters. You can’t start with a big ensemble movie. You need to earn that.”

      Under Hamada and Emmerich, the studio has become more comfortable with backing comic book movies for adults. “Joker” became the first DC release to nab an R rating, but it won’t be the last. “Birds of Prey” is also expected to get a similar rating and insiders predict that James Gunn’s upcoming “Suicide Squad” sequel will also be R-rated. In the case of “Birds of Prey,” the film won’t be in the pitch-black, grim vein of “Joker.” Insiders describe the film has a more humorous, spirited, girl gang adventure, albeit not one for younger children. A series of recent reshoots dramatically improved test screening results and the studio is confident “Birds of Prey” will be a hit when it opens in February.

      Analysts believe the studio has hit upon a smart strategy — 20th Century Fox had backed R-rated comic book movies such as “Deadpool” and “Logan,” but after being bought by Disney, which prefers its heroes to be cleaner and less prone to f-bombs, it’s unclear if it will continue to back those type of projects.

      “There’s a huge appetite for R-rated superhero movies and if Marvel isn’t going to step up, that presents an opening for DC to tap into that audience,” said Jeff Bock, an analyst with Exhibitor Relations.

      Beyond embracing the darker undercurrents of the DC canon, the company is also revisiting characters that they believe were ill-served by previous big screen adventures. “Green Lantern Corps” remains a priority despite the fact that 2011’s “Green Lantern” was a high-profile commercial disaster. Johns is delivering a script at the end of the year. The project may be presented to Abrams and Bad Robot to see if the company would be interested in producing the picture. However, Greg Berlanti, another major talent on the Warner lot, is partnering with Johns on a “Green Lantern” television show. There’s speculation that relationship could lead to his involvement in a feature film.

      Warners and DC also still have faith in Ezra Miller’s smart-ass interpretation of the Flash and are proceeding with development on a standalone film based on the character. DC has tapped “It” director Andy Muschietti to oversee the movie and has enlisted Christina Hodson (“Bumblebee”) to write the screenplay — Hodson will finish that assignment that before moving on to write a screenplay for “Batgirl.” Production on “The Flash” won’t be able to start until Miller finishes up work on the next “Fantastic Beasts” film, which means that cameras are unlikely to roll until 2021.

      DC is also looking to capitalize on the box office success of “Aquaman.” It is currently looking for a director for “The Trench,” a spinoff about a group of vicious undersea creatures who played a supporting role in “Aquaman.” For the next film centered on Jason Momoa’s king of Atlantis, DC has once again tapped James Wan and is hoping to commence shooting in early 2021.

      DC’s future won’t unfold entirely on the big screen. HBO Max, WarnerMedia’s upcoming streaming service, is currently looking for DC properties that could inspire films to premiere on its platform. It hopes to make DC adventures that have slightly lower budgets, requiring them to rely on up-and-coming actors and not established stars, with a goal of keeping production costs under $65 million.

      The launch of HBO Max had inspired some hopes that Warner Bros. might allow Zack Snyder to release a director’s cut of “Justice League,” leading to a social media campaign dubbed #ReleaseTheSnyderCut. Snyder directed an earlier version of the ill-fated super-team movie and had planned to do some reshoots. However, after his daughter died, he was not able to complete production and was replaced by Joss Whedon, who injected a more light-hearted tone into the final film. Logistically, however, there’s little appetite at the studio for spending the millions of dollars it would require to finish visual effects and editing work on Snyder’s version, particularly as “Justice League” was a commercial disaster. There are currently no plans to release a Snyder version either in theaters or on HBO Max.

      “That’s a pipe dream,” said one knowledgeable insider. “There’s no way it’s ever happening.”

      Source

       

       

      Link to post
      Share on other sites

      I think some of the DC heroes are just played out, tbh. I’ve never had much interest in Superman and I don’t think I’ve ever seen a Superman film in my lifetime. I think it’s just a generational gap, but I get them not wanting to give up on it because it’s their signature and original guy. Would be a cool take, but the idea of the Batman/Birds of Prey stand-alone spinoffs seem much more interesting to me. 

      :draglina:

      Link to post
      Share on other sites
      3 minutes ago, Jeigz said:

      the idea of the Batman/Birds of Prey stand-alone spinoffs

      and let’s be clear here, NOT a Harley solo movie! A Catwoman origin true to the comics or whatever universe they’re going with of course, either of the minor BOP girls, even the Batman villains they have cast. The comics are so cerebral and have been around long enough that there’s enough material for everyone and they can come up with something good!

      :draglina: 

      Link to post
      Share on other sites
      8 minutes ago, Eric said:

      Honestly, I only care for Bats I don't really see myself caring for any of the rest of the DC heroes. I hope whatever their planning on doing goes well though.

      Start caring about Wonder Woman 1984 or you're sexist.

      ibs6i4p3eyx7a6xpjjp.gif

      Link to post
      Share on other sites
      8 minutes ago, Jeigz said:

      I think some of the DC heroes are just played out, tbh. I’ve never had much interest in Superman and I don’t think I’ve ever seen a Superman film in my lifetime. I think it’s just a generational gap, but I get them not wanting to give up on it because it’s their signature and original guy. Would be a cool take, but the idea of the Batman/Birds of Prey stand-alone spinoffs seem much more interesting to me. 

      :draglina:

      I agree with the fact that I've never really had much interest in Superman, but that was until I did a little digging and really came to find that there's a really good story that I don't think they've told yet, one that's true to the spirit of him. I explained that in the discussion thread I made about him though. As far as Michael B. Jordan, I like him (think he's hot), but I don't quite see him as Superman? Though I always keep an open mind with DC casting since 9/10 they nail it with an unexpected choice that just works (the only thing that they've gotten DEAD wrong was Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor)

      ibs6i4p3eyx7a6xpjjp.gif

      Link to post
      Share on other sites
      9 minutes ago, Mariah. said:

      I agree with the fact that I've never really had much interest in Superman, but that was until I did a little digging and really came to find that there's a really good story that I don't think they've told yet, one that's true to the spirit of him. I explained that in the discussion thread I made about him though. As far as Michael B. Jordan, I like him (think he's hot), but I don't quite see him as Superman? Though I always keep an open mind with DC casting since 9/10 they nail it with an unexpected choice that just works (the only thing that they've gotten DEAD wrong was Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor)

      ibs6i4p3eyx7a6xpjjp.gif

      OH and Jared Leto as Joker, but that's been WIPED from consciousness lmfao

      ibs6i4p3eyx7a6xpjjp.gif

      Link to post
      Share on other sites
      20 minutes ago, Mariah. said:

      Start caring about Wonder Woman 1984 or you're sexist.

      ibs6i4p3eyx7a6xpjjp.gif

      I opened to edit my post but I switched tabs and left it without editing.

      We love WW and Catwomen the only origin movie I will accept and want to see.

      ibs6i4p3eyx7a6xpjjp.gif

      Link to post
      Share on other sites

      Join the conversation

      You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

      Guest
      Reply to this topic...

      ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

        Only 75 emoji are allowed.

      ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

      ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

      ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

      • Recently Browsing   0 members

        No registered users viewing this page.

      • Similar Content

        • By Mariah.
          Girl, this shit is a fucking mess
          To sum it up, courtesy of ONTD:
           
        • By Mariah.
          Metacritic: 66
          Rotten Tomatoes: 79%
           
          "[I]t's also brimming with the same wonder and joy as the first film, the rare movie - of any stripe - that doesn't just want to believe in the goodness of people, but is willing to make them truly work for it. That's superheroic." - Kate Erbland, indieWire
          "A notable improvement on its already great predecessor, Wonder Woman 1984 is exactly the kind of bright and hopeful movie the character's legacy deserves." - Matt Purslow, IGN
          "In a year when the cinemagoing experience could be categorised as 'much too little', you can't really blame WW84 for giving us a bit too much." - Philip De Semlyen, Time Out
          "Director Patty Jenkins has followed that original film... with something much longer, cornier and wobblier, but which is energised with a streak of pure movie-star enchantment that recalls the sparkly-eyed uplift of the Christopher Reeve Superman films." - Robbie Collin, Daily Telegraph (UK)
          "Maybe Wonder Woman will be the one to save us, after all." - Mary Sollosi, Entertainment Weekly
          "[D]irector Patty Jenkins and her star, Gal Gadot, have mastered the art of cornball conviction." - Justin Lang, Los Angeles Times
          "There's still a lot to love." - David Rooney, Hollywood Reporter
          "Jenkins is an enormously talented filmmaker on whom the studio took a chance - one that's seldom questioned when conferred upon men - and she proves her worth by never letting the spectacle drown out the performances." - Peter Debruge, Variety
          "As candy-coloured and bright as the first film was all muddy dark-blues, Wonder Woman 1984 has an enlivening sense of bubbly pop to it." - Barry Hertz, Globe and Mail (Canada)
          "This is a throwback piece of pure pop entertainment." - Richard Roeper, Chicago Sun Times
          "The film's wickedly pungent social satire must occasionally step aside for superheroics, of course. And while the reteaming of Gadot and Jenkins provides the expected thrills and excitement, this sequel shares the significant flaw of its predecessor." - Alonso Duralde, The Wrap
          "A vibrant and virtuous adventure packed with all the heart and heroism we've come to expect from DC's shining light. Wonder Woman 1984 really is the hero 2020 needed all along." - Ben Travis, Empire Magazine
          "If WW84 can't quite reach the heights of the first film, it still soars beautifully when it matters most." - Angie Han, Mashable
          "Wonder Woman 1984 is solid where it counts, maudlin in the way its fans need it to be, and, similarly, just funny enough to be charming. For all that goes unsaid, the writing is even occasionally clever." - K. Austin Collins, Rolling Stone
          "The same elements that made "Wonder Woman" such a pleasure to watch are present in "WW84," including the supremely self-possessed Gadot, who plays the title character with the same grace and understatement she brought to the initial installment." - Ann Hornaday, Washington Post
          "The ambitions of "Wonder Woman 1984" may be just outside its grasp, but it seldom feels predestined or predictable - a preciously rare commodity in the genre." - Jack Coyle, Associated Press
          -
          I'll update with more of the top critic reviews as they come in! Post any reviews you find here as well.
      ×
      ×
      • Create New...